Harvard federal grants review: The Trump administration has launched a formal review of Harvard University’s federal funding, scrutinizing $9 billion in grants and contracts over allegations of antisemitism on campus. The move follows the administration’s cancellation of $400 million in funding for Columbia University earlier this month.
Government Investigates Harvard’s Federal Contracts
According to officials from the Departments of Education, Health and Human Services, and the General Services Administration, the review includes:
- $255.6 million in federal contracts with Harvard and its affiliates.
- $8.7 billion in multiyear federal grant commitments.
This action follows a broader effort to hold universities accountable for failing to combat antisemitism, particularly in response to campus protests that erupted after the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza.
Crackdown on Ivy League Universities
Harvard is now the second Ivy League institution under intense scrutiny. Earlier this month, the Trump administration rescinded $400 million in federal grants from Columbia University, citing concerns over student safety and anti-Israel demonstrations.
Officials Call Out Harvard’s Response
Education Secretary Linda McMahon criticized Harvard for its handling of antisemitism allegations, stating:
“Harvard has served as a symbol of the American Dream for generations. But its failure to protect students from anti-Semitic discrimination – all while promoting divisive ideologies – has put its reputation in serious jeopardy.”
The administration has emphasized the importance of free inquiry over ideological bias, urging universities to take stronger action against antisemitic incidents.
What Happens Next?
The investigation into Harvard’s government funding might lead to similar actions against other colleges that the Trump administration deems noncompliant in combating antisemitism on campus. As Ivy League institutions continue to face criticism, universities may be subject to further government oversight.
Source: USA Today
